Posts by Jonathan Drake

26

The Man Who Interviewed the Apostles

by TerryWalstrom in

meet papias.

if you had lived in the time of the living apostles of jesus would you have personally investigated stories about.

or, would you simply read whatever was written instead?.

Jonathan Drake

@opusdei & Smiddy

knowledge of the culture accounts for that discrepancy. Passover was celebrated as the festival of unleavened bread, and was a seven day observance. The first day and last days were the most special, but here is where it gets confusing for us looking back: technically, the 15th of Nisan (first day of Passover) began on the 14th after dusk. I can look that up for you all if you need, I have a reference I'd need to find in a book I have about the Jewish culture.

So that is why if you look in the accounts of Matthew and mark, it'll say it began on the first day of the festival of unleavened bread. This is not the same as Passover, but was the day the Passover sacrifice was "customarily" offered. Luke 22:21 explains this day was CALLED Passover, but it wasn't actually Passover. Not until dusk, at which point the next day begins.

also, technically John doesn't say they observed the meal the day before, it says Christ knew the day before "the festival" of the Passover - not the day before Passover (John 13:1). Whereas Matt 26:2 shows Jesus saying "two days from now IS PASSOVER". The difference here is this: the festival began on the 14th, the Passover sacrifice was offered, and families prepared to celebrate the Passover after dusk (which according to the Jewish calendar was the beginning of the next day. The 15th, which was Passover). So where matthew wrote Christ saying Passover was in two days would have been Nisan 13th. Where John wrote that he knew the day before the festival would have been a reference to the 13th, saying that he knew (compare matt 26:2), but john was not saying they observed Passover on a different day, only that Jesus knew before Passover that his "hour had come."

I know now that's confusing but it's true.

26

The Man Who Interviewed the Apostles

by TerryWalstrom in

meet papias.

if you had lived in the time of the living apostles of jesus would you have personally investigated stories about.

or, would you simply read whatever was written instead?.

Jonathan Drake

I have never trusted, and will never trust, the catholic church. Ever.

(No offense to any catholics)

19

Interesting statement made by CO. Is this new?

by stillin in

in his first talk of the week the co mentioned that people don't get df'd for joining the military or registering to vote because they are already gone, as compared with smoking secretly, which would merit df'ing.. i have been toying around with registering to vote in the next election (us) so this intrigues me..

Jonathan Drake

No that's always been. Joining the military is considered an act of disassociation. it happened to my family member. Even though it's effectively the same, being disassociated and being disfellowshipped are two different things.

17

Rev 17:9 - Thoughts?

by leaving_quietly in

rev 17:9 describes something about the "woman", the harlot, babylon the great:.

here is where the intelligence that has wisdom comes in: the seven heads mean seven mountains, where the woman sits on top.

and there are seven kings: five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet arrived, but when he does arrive he must remain a short while.. i was dreaming about this verse last night, so i thought i'd look it up.

Jonathan Drake

@londonagain

there are other problems with this theory however, and I apologize for assuming you came up with it btw.

the theory asserts Babylon the great was Jerusalem. But in revelation, the harlot known as babylon the great has a kingdom over the Kings of the earth. The Jews, and Jerusalem, have never had such a domination in history. They were looked down on, to the point of being despised, by many roman officials and officers. Jerusalem, and in fact all of Israel, has never had a dominion over anyone but itself.

So, aside from the timeline issue, Jerusalem doesn't at all fit the discription.

17

Rev 17:9 - Thoughts?

by leaving_quietly in

rev 17:9 describes something about the "woman", the harlot, babylon the great:.

here is where the intelligence that has wisdom comes in: the seven heads mean seven mountains, where the woman sits on top.

and there are seven kings: five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet arrived, but when he does arrive he must remain a short while.. i was dreaming about this verse last night, so i thought i'd look it up.

Jonathan Drake

@Londo

except that Nero died in 68, and revelation is largely agreed to have been written after 70. So that puts a rather large hole in your theory.

17

Rev 17:9 - Thoughts?

by leaving_quietly in

rev 17:9 describes something about the "woman", the harlot, babylon the great:.

here is where the intelligence that has wisdom comes in: the seven heads mean seven mountains, where the woman sits on top.

and there are seven kings: five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet arrived, but when he does arrive he must remain a short while.. i was dreaming about this verse last night, so i thought i'd look it up.

Jonathan Drake

The land of seven mountains was a reference everyone used back then to identify Rome, "the land of seven hills"

so the person reading this would have thought of the region known as Rome.

John saw 7 kings, five who were passed, one who is (Rome) and another who had not arrived.

before the rise of the "free world" (usa and Britain are the recognized leaders of this) there was no other real world power between Rome and now. Only an image of it with many monarchies and leaderships vying for power. In the end one succeeded, but in the middle nobody led.

26

WT's subtle attack on Wikipedia!

by Wonderment in

did anyone notice this wt's subtle attack on wikipedia?

they wrote (from the 2011 yearbook of jehovah's witnesses, pp.

9-10. source: 'tracing all things with accuracy'):.

Jonathan Drake

I don't see a problem with this statement. I quote Wikipedia for light discussion, but if things get serious head to my study. Wiki is just not reliable for everything.

18

Watchtower doctrine: Judges 1:19 (God couldn't defeat the Iron Chariots)

by southwest in

this weeks assigned bible reading is judges 1-4. i have never noticed judges 1:19 before which reads in the nwt as:.

jehovah was with judah, and they took possession of the mountainous region, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain,* because they had war chariots with iron scythes.

but in the kj as:.

Jonathan Drake

@Village

Oh oh I know, I see what you mean. However it's established that God was with them, he backed them up, but they had to fight their fight. I'm just saying regardless of how we feel about the scripture, the bible asserts the people had to fight with faith God was with them to succeed; if this wavered and they grew fearful then they lost faith in God and they failed.

This applies in all their battles. Moses is recorded as commenting on it when the spies return with an unfavorable report. He says because of their lack of faith they will not succeed. The loss of faith is implied by the loss of the battle, all through the biblical account of the Israelites this is the reason they lose, lack of faith. Joshua 17:16 addresses these same people and you can see in the context the people are trying to avoid conflict with these people and Joshua says in effect, "what's the problem? God is with you go take care of it." So the Israelites had a long standing fear of these chariots and that is what made them fail.

their failure to oust all the people as directed is later used against them, and God promises because of their failure that they will thus remain among them as a snare (Judges 2:2, 3; compare Numbers 33:55).

18

Watchtower doctrine: Judges 1:19 (God couldn't defeat the Iron Chariots)

by southwest in

this weeks assigned bible reading is judges 1-4. i have never noticed judges 1:19 before which reads in the nwt as:.

jehovah was with judah, and they took possession of the mountainous region, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain,* because they had war chariots with iron scythes.

but in the kj as:.

Jonathan Drake

If i remember correctly, it is not saying God couldnt defeat them, it's saying Judah couldn't. They lost faith in the face of such an enemy and failed to drive them out.

This is referenced later in the bible as them failing to do as God directed and growing fearful of the inhabitants instead of driving them out.

44

rama singh WHAT HE REALLY SAID, so you men can stop lying

by atheist_R_stupid in

"there have been repeated scientific challenges to the.

theory of evolution in the past, and the nonbelievers of evo-.

lution cite them as support for their case.

Jonathan Drake

@johnny drake here is also proof and historical record of how evolution developed.

THAT is a lie.
So from that point whatever you stated is retarded. its as much a LIE as gays people saying "science has proven people are born gay"
ALL YOU HAVE BACKING YOU WILL BE PEOPLE WITH A DOG IN THE RACE...LOOKING TO TAKE A SIDE, not talk science....

I could cite innumerous sources to prove evolution to you, but since you're unlikely to look at any of them I'll give just one. This video started my own investigation into the proof of evolution. Unfortunately ARS, you're incorrect. Not only is evolution a proven fact, but a vast amount of Christians believe it as well. Any educated individual is going to pity a person who refused to accept evolution at this point. You will never convince anyone, anywhere, it's untrue.

http://www.openculture.com/2014/03/neil-degrasse-tyson-tells-fox-viewers-evolution-is-a-scientific-fact-on-cosmos.html